US Navy Introduces New LCS Mission Packages
- October 4, 2012
- / Category The Lighter Side
- / Posted By viribus unitis
- / No Comments.
International Maritime Satire Week Warning: The following is a piece of fiction intended to elicit insight through the use of satire and written by those who do not make a living being funny – so it’s not serious and very well might not be funny.
In a written statement to the press today, U.S. Navy Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Jonathan Greenert unveiled a previously secret Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) mission package. The U.S. Navy, he announced, had developed a Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) mission package to fill a critical capability gap. It will be ready to deploy for testing in the fleet within two months.
According to the statement, the prototype LCS BMD mission package will be tested in the Strait of Hormuz. Analysts however predict it may be most useful for directly screening carrier groups in the South China Sea or patrolling the seas around Japan. In either case, the mission package not only represents the first mission module beyond the three in the original LCS Concept of Operations (CONOPS), it also represents an effort to serve as a cost-cutting measure and appeal to those who wanted the sometimes controversial ship to have more high-end capabilities.
Admiral Greenert’s call ”to move from luxury-car platforms…toward dependable trucks” on the pages of U.S. Naval Institute’s Proceedings raises an interesting question about what happens when the payload is worth more than the truck itself. Is a BMD LCS a Ford or a Ferrari? Or maybe a Ford with a Ferrari engine?
In related news, the CNO revealed all LCS that will not receive a BMD mission package will be outfitted with a combined anti-submarine warfare/mine counter-measures/surface warfare mission package, which for security reasons will be invisible.
Like us on Facebook
CIMSEC Twitter Feed
My TweetsRecent Posts
- Navy Combat Information Integration
- Costs vs. Capabilities: Canada’s National Shipbuilding Procurement Strategy
- Wrapping Up Alternatives to DDG Flight III
- X-47B Sea Trials – A BFD
- Patos, Logos, Etos and the LCS Design Trap
Categories
- 3D Printing
- Beans Boots Bullets
- Current Capability Analysis
- Current Operations
- Cyber War
- Drones
- Events
- Future Tech
- Future War
- New Initiatives
- Seamanship and Leadership
- Seasteading
- Strategic Outlook
- Tactical Concepts
- The Lighter Side
- Uncategorized
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
We Suggest
- Australia: ASPI's The Strategist
- Australia: Security Scholar
- Britain: The Risky Shift
- Canada: Atlantic Council of Canada – Maritime Issues
- Germany: Seidlers Sicherheistpolitik
- Poland: Viribus Unitis
- U.S.: CDR Salamander
- U.S.: Chuck Hill's CG Blog
- U.S.: Defense Tech
- U.S.: gCaptain
- U.S.: Information Dissemination
- U.S.: NavalDrones
- U.S.: Navy Center for Innovation Weblog
- U.S.: The Naval Diplomat
- U.S.: USNI Blog
- U.S.: Wired's Danger Room
Blogs of Our Friends
- Adam Elkus: Rethinking Security
- Amy Lindahl: Sailing Into the Desert
- Andrew Erickson
- Bryan McGrath: The Conservative Wahoo

