Comments for Center for International Maritime Security http://cimsec.org Home of the NextWar Blog Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:40:20 -0400 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 Comment on Reconfiguring the US-ROK Naval Strategy for the Wartime OPCON Transfer (Part I) by chuckhhill http://cimsec.org/reconfiguring-the-us-rok-naval-strategy-for-the-wartime-opcon-transfer-part-i/#comment-1193 chuckhhill Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:40:20 +0000 http://cimsec.org/?p=5692#comment-1193 Perhaps a regular rotation schedule among the three navies, with the prospective commander serving as deputy for a time before assuming command.

]]> Comment on Reconfiguring the US-ROK Naval Strategy for the Wartime OPCON Transfer (Part I) by J. Lee (@j_lee077) http://cimsec.org/reconfiguring-the-us-rok-naval-strategy-for-the-wartime-opcon-transfer-part-i/#comment-1191 J. Lee (@j_lee077) Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:40:11 +0000 http://cimsec.org/?p=5692#comment-1191 There would also be issues involving equipment compatibility–ROKN equipment has a long way to go–logistics, not to mention language barriers. But many of these issues have been overcome through exchange programs and joint exercises.

All right. I will no doubt flesh these out in more detail by next Sunday the 30th DC time.

]]> Comment on Reconfiguring the US-ROK Naval Strategy for the Wartime OPCON Transfer (Part I) by Scott C-P http://cimsec.org/reconfiguring-the-us-rok-naval-strategy-for-the-wartime-opcon-transfer-part-i/#comment-1190 Scott C-P Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:28:25 +0000 http://cimsec.org/?p=5692#comment-1190 A combined fleet is in concept an interesting idea, but the devil would be in the details. As Chuck Hill points out the issue of command would be a very tricky one not easily overcome, but there might be flexible models to be found in the recent HOA counter-piracy experiences. Looking forward to your thoughts on the form in the next post.

]]> Comment on Reconfiguring the US-ROK Naval Strategy for the Wartime OPCON Transfer (Part I) by Jeong Lee http://cimsec.org/reconfiguring-the-us-rok-naval-strategy-for-the-wartime-opcon-transfer-part-i/#comment-1189 Jeong Lee Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:59:12 +0000 http://cimsec.org/?p=5692#comment-1189 Nor would ROKN admirals want to place themselves under their Japanese counterparts. On that point, I agree. However, there comes a point where they have to set aside historical grievances to deal with a common threat. However, as VADM Koda of JMSDF argued in his paper for the Naval War College, both navies are already starting to develop a solid rapport.

]]> Comment on Reconfiguring the US-ROK Naval Strategy for the Wartime OPCON Transfer (Part I) by Maya Boneva http://cimsec.org/reconfiguring-the-us-rok-naval-strategy-for-the-wartime-opcon-transfer-part-i/#comment-1188 Maya Boneva Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:13:35 +0000 http://cimsec.org/?p=5692#comment-1188 More combined fleet means more flexible and cooperative unite. May be more trust.This is what is necessary now.

]]>