Battlefield Reclamation and 3D Printing
- May 2, 2012
- / Category 3D Printing, Future Tech
- / Posted By Matt Hipple
- / 2 Comments.
5th and final post in our series on 3D printing.
3D printing revolutionizes the supply chain by removing the need for many specific parts, but it still lacks true independence due to the need for “toner.” If necessary, a soldier in the field can pick up the weapon of his neutralized enemy and use it to continue the fight, but the wreckage of war is often left to rot, useless for more than cover. However, the great material waste found in war can generate immense new capabilities when combined with 3D printing’s need for raw materials.
In the further future, the commander’s greatest source of raw materials for his new 3D printing capability will be the wreckage of the battlefield and waste from his own operations. Everything from the valuable copper in rubble to the wreckage of destroyed vehicles. In most cases, materials can be collected whole: tanks, humvees, burnt-out trucks, bullet casings. Obsolete or worn equipment can be harvested for its raw materials and re-forged into new product. Modern composite weapons can be smashed, damaged, or past their service life; thrown back into the “stock material,” and recycled into a new rifle. Battlefield clearance, broken weapons, and ruined equipment stop being a hindrance and start becoming potential resources for the commander armed with 3D printing.
Whatever cannot be easily ground down and re-purposed can be leached out and re-used. Biomining is the process by which natural and engineered bacteria are used to collect raw material. Industrial-scale use of bacteria to make product is not revolutionary. Beer is the oldest, and perhaps most delicious example that comes to mind for the industrial use of bacteria. Soon we might start using it for fuel. Biomining is already used to leach minerals from low-grade ores, it could potentially salvage materials from rubble or severely degraded equipment.
The direct applications to maritime operations are especially evident for landing operations and damage control. Amphibious landings are always made more precarious by the supply situation, logistics’ tenuous reach to a force on the shore that could potentially be pushed into the sea. With the ability to re-purpose his surrounding environment: cars, computers, telephone wires, etc… a landing force no longer need wait for guns, vehicles, parts, or replacement equipment when these things can be resurrected from wreckage or indigenous infrastructure. At sea, battle-damaged ships can re-forge equipment out of the destroyed material. Imagine if the USS COLE had a 3D printing capability, giving it the ability to replace without restriction any number of critical systems. These ideas only scratch the surface. As the logistics, shape, and field operations of all military forces profoundly transform, not only will our weapons change, but the way we fight will transform with this newfound flexibility and independence.
Like us on Facebook
CIMSEC Twitter Feed
My TweetsRecent Posts
- Navy Combat Information Integration
- Costs vs. Capabilities: Canada’s National Shipbuilding Procurement Strategy
- Wrapping Up Alternatives to DDG Flight III
- X-47B Sea Trials – A BFD
- Patos, Logos, Etos and the LCS Design Trap
Categories
- 3D Printing
- Beans Boots Bullets
- Current Capability Analysis
- Current Operations
- Cyber War
- Drones
- Events
- Future Tech
- Future War
- New Initiatives
- Seamanship and Leadership
- Seasteading
- Strategic Outlook
- Tactical Concepts
- The Lighter Side
- Uncategorized
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
We Suggest
- Australia: ASPI's The Strategist
- Australia: Security Scholar
- Britain: The Risky Shift
- Canada: Atlantic Council of Canada – Maritime Issues
- Germany: Seidlers Sicherheistpolitik
- Poland: Viribus Unitis
- U.S.: CDR Salamander
- U.S.: Chuck Hill's CG Blog
- U.S.: Defense Tech
- U.S.: gCaptain
- U.S.: Information Dissemination
- U.S.: NavalDrones
- U.S.: Navy Center for Innovation Weblog
- U.S.: The Naval Diplomat
- U.S.: USNI Blog
- U.S.: Wired's Danger Room
Blogs of Our Friends
- Adam Elkus: Rethinking Security
- Amy Lindahl: Sailing Into the Desert
- Andrew Erickson
- Bryan McGrath: The Conservative Wahoo


You anticipated some of my thoughts spurred by the previous articles with your note about using algae for fuel production. Algae are, of course, readily available in many parts of the oceans, so they could perhaps be readily harvested to provide carbon-based feedstocks for on-board printing of naval necessities.
Not just fuel, but also plastics/polymers, which are raw material for a lot of 3D printing. Algae (to some degree) and bacteria (even more so) can be engineered to produce quite a few useful polymers or their precursors, and industrial efforts for bio-based production are really gaining ground. One particular example of a major business consumer driving demand is Coke’s plans for 100% biomass bottles by 2020. One could imagine floating resupply farms of engineered algae that could be towed around in tanks. Widespread deployment of engineered organisms (or harvesting enough algae to supply a fleet) could have ecological consequences, but here’s the brainstorm.
…and sorry to be picky, but yeast (for beer brewing) is a single-celled fungus, not a bacterium. Playing my scientist card. Although yogurt usually comes from bacteria.
[...] a byproduct of fresh-water production. I discussed biomining as a tool for commanders attempting to use battlefield refuse for 3D printing, but on a larger scale it produces a duel-win scenario for Seasteads looking for a supply of both [...]